News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by thephyber on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @07:25PM (#21653619)
DDG does use Bing for _some_ of their search results, but it's far from just a reskin.
Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by unicornporn on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @08:24PM (#21653888)
DDG uses Bing, Yahoo! and Yandex for non bang searches[1].

As of October 2019, Yahoo! Search is once again “powered by Bing”[2].

To me, results are as crap as Bing's.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/duckduckgo/comments/6uaibg/comment/...

[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Search

Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by godelski on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @09:45PM (#21654227)
"Uses" is a weird word here. Because some people are suggesting that DDG is a reskin of Bing. But if we look at what DDG says[0], they talk about it the same way they talk about Stack Overflow. No one is crazy enough to say that DDG is a reskin of SO. What they are actually saying is that they are aggregating results. Which I don't understand why that would be a bad thing.

[0] https://help.duckduckgo.com/results/sources/

Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by Kiro on Thursday November 28, 2019 @05:58AM (#21656219)
Money quoute right here: "We also of course have more traditional links in the search results, which we also source from a variety of partners, including Verizon Media (formerly Yahoo) and Bing."

SO and the other 400 sources are only used for instant boxes and other widgets. The real organic search results are all from Bing.

Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by godelski on Thursday November 28, 2019 @03:15PM (#21659902)
Full quote

> In fact, DuckDuckGo gets its results from over four hundred sources. These include hundreds of vertical sources delivering niche Instant Answers, DuckDuckBot (our crawler) and crowd-sourced sites (like Wikipedia, stored in our answer indexes). We also of course have more traditional links in the search results, which we also source from a variety of partners, including Verizon Media (formerly Yahoo) and Bing.

I'm not sure where you're getting

> The real organic search results are all from Bing.

That paragraph __DOES NOT__ say that

Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by Kiro on Friday November 29, 2019 @02:01AM (#21662631)
The paragraph clearly says that.

> more traditional links in the search results

It's super obvious to me what that refers to - the actual search results. The rest is just fluff.

Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by notus on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @08:50PM (#21654013)
Bing is really good for porn for some reason
Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by diffeomorphism on Thursday November 28, 2019 @03:44AM (#21655617)
Uses as some of their main sources:

> In fact, DuckDuckGo gets its results from over four hundred sources. These include hundreds of vertical sources delivering niche Instant Answers, DuckDuckBot (our crawler) and crowd-sourced sites (like Wikipedia, stored in our answer indexes). We also of course have more traditional links in the search results, which we also source from a variety of partners, including Verizon Media (formerly Yahoo) and Bing.

https://help.duckduckgo.com/results/sources/

The results are very similar but not identical to using yahoo or bing.

Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by mda on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @07:39PM (#21653692)
_most_ of their search results. They don't give a breakdown.
Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by kats on Thursday November 28, 2019 @03:35AM (#21655579)
I may be wrong, but I read before on HN than bing is used for 99% of the search results.