News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by godelski on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @09:45PM (#21654227)
"Uses" is a weird word here. Because some people are suggesting that DDG is a reskin of Bing. But if we look at what DDG says[0], they talk about it the same way they talk about Stack Overflow. No one is crazy enough to say that DDG is a reskin of SO. What they are actually saying is that they are aggregating results. Which I don't understand why that would be a bad thing.

[0] https://help.duckduckgo.com/results/sources/

Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by Kiro on Thursday November 28, 2019 @05:58AM (#21656219)
Money quoute right here: "We also of course have more traditional links in the search results, which we also source from a variety of partners, including Verizon Media (formerly Yahoo) and Bing."

SO and the other 400 sources are only used for instant boxes and other widgets. The real organic search results are all from Bing.

Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by godelski on Thursday November 28, 2019 @03:15PM (#21659902)
Full quote

> In fact, DuckDuckGo gets its results from over four hundred sources. These include hundreds of vertical sources delivering niche Instant Answers, DuckDuckBot (our crawler) and crowd-sourced sites (like Wikipedia, stored in our answer indexes). We also of course have more traditional links in the search results, which we also source from a variety of partners, including Verizon Media (formerly Yahoo) and Bing.

I'm not sure where you're getting

> The real organic search results are all from Bing.

That paragraph __DOES NOT__ say that

Re:Twitter CEO Endorses DuckDuckGo by Kiro on Friday November 29, 2019 @02:01AM (#21662631)
The paragraph clearly says that.

> more traditional links in the search results

It's super obvious to me what that refers to - the actual search results. The rest is just fluff.