News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Lisp-Flavored Programming Languages. Parent comment

Re:Lisp-Flavored Programming Languages by rusini on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @09:23AM (#21648025)
I know :) And that's cool, and that property is the base of my own programming language. I am also trying right now to find some explanation why it's cool based on some fundamental conclusions from theoretic computer science...

I just feel that when someone says that Lisp does not have syntax or that syntax is not important, it's plain wrong...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Lisp-Flavored Programming Languages by lispm on Thursday November 28, 2019 @04:00AM (#21655681)
> I just feel that when someone says that Lisp does not have syntax or that syntax is not important, it's plain wrong...

I completely agree. I just feel that not every programming language needs to have the same approach to syntax. Lisp is different from most languages in its way to have a data syntax in which programs are written. Thus the data syntax is textual (s-expressions) and the program syntax is structural (based on data structures like lists, symbols, numbers, ..).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Lisp-Flavored Programming Languages by kazinator on Thursday November 28, 2019 @12:50PM (#21659045)
Let's put it this way:

Every function and macro description in the HyperSpec has a "Syntax:" synopsis right at the top.

Section 2 of the standard is "Syntax".

[ Parent | on HN ]