News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber loses licence to operate in London, will still opera... by onion2k on Monday November 25, 2019 @06:02AM (#21627015)
This seems, from a technical perspective, an easy problem to solve with the resources of a public company.

Is it the desperation of people who need the money so badly they will constantly cheat the system? Can you design for that?

I don't think the motivation on the part of the drivers who do this is very important. They're intentionally deceiving Uber customers, and in some cases endangering them. That just has to stop, even if the driver is desperate. The point here is that it's Uber's responsibility to stop it happening, and Uber has apparently chosen not to (like you, it's not that hard). That will be very hard to justify, especially as Uber were running TV ads about how they do background checks on all their drivers here in the UK recently.

Re:Uber loses licence to operate in London, will still opera... by slfnflctd on Monday November 25, 2019 @07:18AM (#21627432)
I'm an Uber driver in the U.S. midwest (so I'm not sure if they're operating the same way in London), but every so often they make me take a live selfie within their app or I cannot accept new rides.

It's a pain in the ass to have to pull over and do this sometimes, but it does seem like they're trying to do the right thing with it. I will say that at first it made me pretty angry, but when I realized the implication - that someone has probably already tried to fraudulently hand control to a different driver - it gave me chills and I realized they may not have many other options.

Re:Uber loses licence to operate in London, will still opera... by lotsofpulp on Monday November 25, 2019 @06:46AM (#21627244)
Other than constant facial recognition via camera pointed at the driver, how does anyone (not just Uber), guarantee that an approved driver doesn’t get out of the car and a non approved driver get in and start driving?

Perhaps a selfie with the driver taken by the passengers during the drive would also suffice.

In my opinion, Uber has done enough. They provide the passenger with the drivers name and photo. It’s up to the passenger to verify, but Uber should make violations easy to report.

Re:Uber loses licence to operate in London, will still opera... by us0r on Monday November 25, 2019 @06:55AM (#21627293)
>It’s up to the passenger to verify, but Uber should make violations easy to report.

They are. Click a trip, scroll down, click "my driver was unprofessional", click "my driver didnt match the profile in my app".

The problem is most people dont report stuff to uber. I hear stories all the time from people and everytime I ask if they reported the driver they say no.

Re:Uber loses licence to operate in London, will still opera... by JazCE on Monday November 25, 2019 @06:51AM (#21627269)
using the fingerprint reader on a phone to accept any job?
Re:Uber loses licence to operate in London, will still opera... by darkwater on Monday November 25, 2019 @07:58AM (#21627711)
Fingerprint on a phone (either iOS or Android) only authenticates the local phone user, it doesn't really expose any mean of unique identification to the app. So, basically even if you enforce fingerprinting to use the app, it would just authenticate/match whatever fingerprint was registered in the underlying OS.