News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TikTok: Cheerfulness and censorship by oefrha on Sunday November 24, 2019 @06:13AM (#21619683)
I’ve been in a managing position of a small forum (around a hundred active members at a time, plus a few thousand lurking members) before. We remove off-topic content but don’t kick anyone other than spammers and outright trolls. There have been some cases of conflict; they were handled privately. Public complaints are not allowed (see “we remove off-topic content”). Members may complain to admins and admins may talk to both sides, but since we don’t kick anyone, the most dire consequences (from us) are that one or both parties get a temp ban from a day to a week if they keep posting complaints or arguing publicly. Most conflicts go away eventually; a few members may have left due to conflicts, but that’s okay, they just blend into the organic churn.

> they die, or face harassment from people either inside or outside the community.

I fail to see why some online admins can stop any of these.

Re:TikTok: Cheerfulness and censorship by fzeroracer on Sunday November 24, 2019 @06:22AM (#21619716)
Right and what you've just admitted is that said forum is indeed political. The moderation and admin style is selecting users that best fit into the forum culture. Users leave as a result of either typical churn or because they don't align well with the forum.

Every single forum is going to grow a culture around it consisting of memes, ways of talking, interacting with others etc which are all very political in nature. The fact that you've seen conflicts and have had to resolve them is proof of this. It's just human nature and fits the very definition of politics.

Re:TikTok: Cheerfulness and censorship by oefrha on Sunday November 24, 2019 @06:39AM (#21619779)
> selecting users that best fit into the forum culture.

Yeah, we select users who can stay on topic and who can contain anger and resolve conflicts like adults (or rather, like decent human beings; we did have teenage users). Not a tough ask, and neither outrageous nor outlandish for a topical forum.

Re:TikTok: Cheerfulness and censorship by fzeroracer on Sunday November 24, 2019 @06:52AM (#21619834)
Sure, but in that process you have to make decisions and weigh how to punish users. You have a set of rules and ideals users have to follow, which form the governance structure of your forum.

And the definition of politics is the art or science of governing. Forums operate much like miniature societies with their own laws and best conduct. Forums might be entities targetted towards very specific subjects but that doesn't free them from being political. It just means that the forum is aligned to your specific beliefs.

Re:TikTok: Cheerfulness and censorship by Reelin on Sunday November 24, 2019 @07:38AM (#21620043)
> And the definition of politics is the art or science of governing.

> It just means that the forum is aligned to your specific beliefs.

Those two statements are using different definitions of the word politics. Carefully enforcing a reasonably bland and objective set of rules is not political by any definition of the term in use by the people you're arguing with here. It only becomes political if the rules themselves take a stance on current social issues.

Of course, using the other definition, the rules themselves are political because somebody could debate them and that would be a form of political action. So you could claim it's not politics free under that definition. But that's not what was actually being discussed here, so it isn't useful in this context.

Re:TikTok: Cheerfulness and censorship by fzeroracer on Sunday November 24, 2019 @06:15PM (#21624187)
It is very political because those rules are interpreted and applied to humans. We all use our best judgment to determine how to apply and govern forums we mod or admin.

But what you're doing is conflating 'political' with 'current social issues'. Those are two entirely separate things and while current social issues are political, not everything political relates to current social issues. Forums fit the use of the word political to a tee no matter the definition you use.

Which is really the greater issue I see here on HN and across the various tech communities. As I've mentioned it is impossible for your group to be apolitical because at best that just means you agree with the status quo which is a political stance in itself.