Would a better long term fix be to upgrade grid hardware such that it can survive an inadvertent largish island?
Sometimes I think that a DC grid would be better. Issues like frequency synchronization wouldn’t exist.
Re:Tesla PowerWall 2 Hack
by Denvercoder9 on Saturday November 23, 2019 @06:49AM
(#21613657)
A DC grid is likely better nowadays, but we're stuck with the historic AC grid. Most of the problems DC faced back in the war of currents have been solved by solid state technology.
Re:Tesla PowerWall 2 Hack
by londons_explore on Saturday November 23, 2019 @03:12AM
(#21613041)
To reconnect a powered island to the main grid, one needs to match frequency and phase with it.
There is currently no way to control the frequency or phase of the island.
That gold code could be received and decoded anywhere on the network. If power islanding occurs, embedded generation will detect the loss of the gold code (since they are no longer connected to the generator injecting the code), and cease supply.
The only disadvantage is it introduces a security vulnerability by design: Anyone could transmit the gold code from their house, effectively disabling islanding protection in their neighbourhood. If power islanding were to occur, and if there was sufficient embedded generation to keep a stable power island, grid hardware could be destroyed through overvoltage, overheating, and circuits closing without frequency synchronisation. I think it's a worthwhile tradeoff though - damage will be localized and minimal, and a very unusual set of circumstances have to happen outside the attackers control for the attack to do damage.