I understand that p.Rot is a shitty approximation of a sum type, but it still works and almost certainly won't break anything since Go forces you to explicitly typecast. The important thing is that the list of possible actions wasn't sealed by the type system, which in the original example it was.

I want to reiterate that I am aware sum types can be useful. I just don't think they're useful _enough_ to outweigh being a footgun for calling code.