News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Clang Format Tanks Performance. Parent comment

Re:Clang Format Tanks Performance by Ygg2 on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @08:49AM (#21583829)
Where did you pull those numbers?

Looking at https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...

While the worst case is 40% slower (where even C perfored abysmally), most of the time the Rust is within a 10% margin of error, and in quite a few cases it's faster.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Clang Format Tanks Performance by NoZZz on Thursday November 21, 2019 @02:10PM (#21598136)
Strange benchmark, comparing llvm(rust) to gcc(c++ code)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Clang Format Tanks Performance by The_rationalist on Friday November 22, 2019 @03:38AM (#21603890)
As nozzz said, this is using clang. So I should correct my statement, c++ is in average 30% faster as gcc is in average 20% faster than llvm.
[ Parent | on HN ]