News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:"Google Stadia is not a product that exists because peopl... by edna314 on Tuesday November 19, 2019 @11:34AM (#21574865)
Doesn’t it make more sense if google buys this gpu and shares it among, say, 50 users who have maximum an hour of gaming every week? It almost certainly has to be cheaper sharing hardware among users instead of having each single user owning a piece of hardware which is idle almost all of the time. Unless of course hardware price is neglect-able with respect to game price.
Re:"Google Stadia is not a product that exists because peopl... by chrischen on Tuesday November 19, 2019 @09:59PM (#21580741)
The equilibrium cost of sharing the hardware vs owning will probably be similar... the main difference here is that you're also playing with noticeable latency for fast action games which, even if you play infrequently, will impact the game play of certain games.
Re:"Google Stadia is not a product that exists because peopl... by guitarbill on Tuesday November 19, 2019 @12:21PM (#21575486)
i'm interested how this will work at peak times, when everybody gets back from work and wants to play? or for new releases. are they just going to throw money at it and be massively over-provisioned most of the time?
Re:"Google Stadia is not a product that exists because peopl... by mrep on Tuesday November 19, 2019 @04:26PM (#21578485)
Presumably over provision and then when idle, they can reuse them for their own internal batch work.
Re:"Google Stadia is not a product that exists because peopl... by edna314 on Tuesday November 19, 2019 @12:47PM (#21575821)
Sure, there are lot of scenarios how this could fail and I might be a bit optimistic, but the idea just makes sense. If stadia doesn’t work out sooner or later there will be a platform that will work.