Re:"Google Stadia is not a product that exists because peopl...
by zaarn on Tuesday November 19, 2019 @10:48AM
(#21574124)
I (EU) played regularly with someone in Australia on R6:S and it wasn't much of a problem. He's used to latency issues so he played as well as anyone else would.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:"Google Stadia is not a product that exists because peopl...
by EugeneOZ on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @12:44AM
(#21581377)
It's not possible to get used to such huge latency (500ms). He is a burden for a team in competitive games. It is a fact (if that "friend from Australia" exist at all).
Re:"Google Stadia is not a product that exists because peopl...
by zaarn on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @12:54AM
(#21581415)
That friend certainly exists and he's not a burden on the team. Maybe you focus too much on the latency number and forget that some people play to have fun, while still playing very decently.
I think it's very rude you suggest I don't know people in Australia (do you even know someone from Australia?)
Re:"Google Stadia is not a product that exists because peopl...
by EugeneOZ on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @02:18AM
(#21581752)
Still I don't believe you. I have experience of playing competitive shooter with 250ms latency and it was nearly impossible to aim. And you are talking about 500ms latency. Let's just agree to disagree.
Re:"Google Stadia is not a product that exists because peopl...
by zaarn on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @02:22AM
(#21581775)
Well, he plays with between 100 and 300ms latency on average, atleast whenever I check the player screen. They're perfectly capable of hitting targets reliably.
On a similar note, I used to play World of Tanks with around 400ms latency before I got a better internet uplink, while it's certainly bad for a month, you start to get used to it eventually and the brain compensates. Of course, if reaction time matters you loose, but you can adapt your playstyle in a lot of games so that pure reaction time doesn't matter as much.