You're plastering this thread with the same talking points. People are responding to you. Were you going to address any of the responses, or just keep plastering?

Generally people accused of serious crimes are not as free as the rest of us.

He has always been free to face his accusers.

BS. They're accusing him under a law that would not allow him to present any motive for what he did. Not a fair trial by most countries' standards.

What is an acceptable motive for rape?

The charges he will be facing on the US are for spionage (under patriot act) not rape.

Please don’t do that here. We’re not talking about rape. We’re talking about the espionage accusations.

Not really. It was the arrest warrant for the rape charges in Sweden that kept him confined in the Ecuadorian embassy.

I thought the news was about Sweden dropping the case of rape.

I've done my reading, nowhere it was mentioned that it wasn't about the allegations of rape.

BTW, the comments guidelines state

    Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article?