Yes, FedEx didn't follow up with the massive new boosts they promised (besides the pension fund). However, the NYT should have included figures and stated it how you are in your comment - that growth factor is what has gone down, not the actual level of investment.
I am not disputing what you say about FedEx, I just want NYT to be more careful and precise in its reporting.
They've been building 800,000 square feet of new sort facility at IND for a year and change...
https://www.indystar.com/story/news/2018/01/26/fedex-credits...
https://bgabuilders.com/fedex-indianapolis-ob4-project/
It's huge and runs right along side Interstate 70, you can see it from the other side of the airport just off of U.S. 40.
I can walk to my car, drive about 10 yards out of my work parking lot and see it across the airport. It's very real and almost certainly didn't grow out of the ground on its own accord.
They're also expanding in Greenwood, Indiana.
They're also expanding at MEM.
...
https://marketrealist.imgix.net/uploads/2018/09/Capex-2.png?... indicates their spending growth has largely just stayed what it was prior to the tax changes.
The fact that they instead increased stock buybacks etc. demonstrates a point of detractors of the tax law - that it's proceeds would most likely go back into already-wealthy pockets, not capital investment. It's not unreasonable to point it out here.
FedEx's lobbying efforts argued reduced taxes would allow them to increase capital spending more than they would have otherwise. Instead, they look to have stuck to their trendline - and 2019's estimated is flat.
Draw those numbers on a chart and it doesn't look like the tax cut generated much of a boost: https://marketrealist.imgix.net/uploads/2018/09/Capex-2.png?...
Article from which the chart is drawn: https://articles2.marketrealist.com/2018/09/a-look-at-fedexs...