Once upon a time, Google autocorrected "she invented" to "he invented".
It does raise the question though, that bias is in the real-world data. Why should a search engine ignore the real world to paint a happier picture?
You can argue that Google's (and Baidu's and Yandex's) results aren't very good in the former case, and I would agree, but to imply bias intentionally added by the company is to ignore what a search engine does.
As far as your abortion example, Bing very clearly took an editorial decision to put its thumb on the search results ranking, going so far as showing a "vs." with two different articles at the top. Google just let its default relevancy algorithm do the ranking, which means articles that contain both the words "good" and "bad" will tend to rank higher than articles that just contain "bad."
The exact same checks apply to this case to throw out the Google bias argument as right wing outrage hysterics targeted at simpletons who don't know how to verify the assertion. My Google results contain two first page links that say without argument that abortion is bad. Both Yandex and Bing have 0.