Re:CSS Utility Classes and “Separation of Concerns” (2017)
by chrisweekly on Saturday November 16, 2019 @02:48PM
(#21554522)
There doesn't need to be, given CSS-in-JS!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:CSS Utility Classes and “Separation of Concerns” (2017)
by koboll on Saturday November 16, 2019 @03:03PM
(#21554620)
It's wild to me that most of the discourse around CSS-in-JS is about personal preference for how separation of concerns should be when its biggest advantage is totally orthogonal to that--it almost completely solves the issues of scope, specificity, and mapping styles to markup that so many different libraries and methodologies have been invented to cope with over the years.
Re:CSS Utility Classes and “Separation of Concerns” (2017)
by chrisweekly on Saturday November 16, 2019 @04:38PM
(#21555136)
upvoted and agreed