News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Knightscope’s Security Robots Surveil the Public by paulgerhardt on Saturday November 16, 2019 @11:17AM (#21553355)
Knightscope is worth a close study. If they were a consumer facing startup, PR blunders would have forced them to close years ago. Yes, one of their machines ran over a small child[1]. Yes, they had a disastrous “mini-ipo”[2]. Yes, they’re frequently a “look how dumb AI is” counter point to the Boston Dynamics machines[3].

But they’re not consumer facing. They found a market niche as a punching bag for municipal and local spaces (malls, libraries, subways) who treat the users of public space as hostile adversaries.

If dunking on Knightscope worked, they would have been done in already. If one is anti this kind of approach to civic management it’s important to name the community “leaders” advocating for them, the social economics that render $7/hour Knightscope rental more viable than more empathetic solutions, and the investors supporting these dark patterns.

[1] https://www.theverge.com/2016/7/13/12170640/mall-security-ro... [2] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1600983/000114420417... [3] https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/17/20697540/boston-dynamics-...

Re:How Knightscope’s Security Robots Surveil the Public by swimfar on Saturday November 16, 2019 @01:13PM (#21554034)
I believe that it was actually the kid that ran into the robot. But I can't find any followup articles about the incident, only initial reports.
Re:How Knightscope’s Security Robots Surveil the Public by jcims on Saturday November 16, 2019 @11:46AM (#21553538)
If they made their robots this cute nobody would mind - https://youtu.be/G6fMV1UPzkg?t=62
Re:How Knightscope’s Security Robots Surveil the Public by aaron695 on Saturday November 16, 2019 @06:36PM (#21555629)
> If they were a consumer facing startup, PR blunders would have forced them to close years ago.

Example of a consumer facing startup that PR blunders shut down?