Re:GC Fun at Twitch
by dwohnitmok on Saturday November 16, 2019 @12:02AM
(#21551107)
To Go's credit, it predates Shenandoah and ZGC, before which your only real option for low-latency GC on the JVM was Zing, which I don't think had too many people using it (I certainly have no personal experience with it). I can't say whether they were inspired by Go, but I do think that Go is responsible for bringing the desirability of low-latency GC, even at potentially high cost to throughput, to the forefront of the greater programming community's attention.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
They could offer other ways to manage memory manually instead of just escape analysis, like GC enabled systems languages, but that is not the nature of Go's design.
Do you not consider G1 a low latency GC?
Re:GC Fun at Twitch
by dwohnitmok on Saturday November 16, 2019 @12:38PM
(#21553823)
When considering latency, it's still not in the same league as Shenandoah and ZGC. We still had occasional GC times over a second with G1 on some production systems several years ago IIRC.