It will become power users controlling the narrative. Sort of like how edits and that approval process on wikipedia operate right now.

Yeah I gotta be honest the two sites I both like and hate most on the internet are Wikipedia and StackOverflow. Great resources in most cases but my god the moderation is.. overbearing.

I have my doubts that'll work for a social network. Good luck to them, but I'll have probably forgotten I signed up by the time they next send me an email.

Side note you seem to be able to bypass the signup queue by visiting your own friend share link.

"Good behavior" is double speak for "following the groupthink". Just look at wikipedia for an example of how bad this can become, where 1/3 of all content is edited and moderated by one dude with all his biases.

This wiki model is not the solution.

Could you point to something specific about the "1/3 of all content is edited and moderated by one dude"? Not sure where to look.

There's some data here but isn't even close to 1/3:

The article talks about user "koavf", who is #2 by number of edits

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_...

Yes, as the wiki model is in despair.

Social network posts aren't a collection of verifiable facts. The idea of someone being able to edit my post about my family vacation strikes me as more than a little bizarre.