News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:16-inch MacBook Pro by lotsofpulp on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @01:09PM (#21527332)
>You are fairly asking why this particular corner was cut for costs, and it does seem a weird place to save a few bucks when, as you say, the price is ~$4,000.

Because the marginal cost of a better camera doesn't yield a sufficient increase in marginal revenue.

Re:16-inch MacBook Pro by bhauer on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @01:20PM (#21527471)
I wonder what their models predicted as marginal revenue of the touchbar and butterfly keyboard mechanisms, and how that compared to their marginal cost.
Re:16-inch MacBook Pro by erobbins on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @03:40PM (#21529278)
Well, those are 2 of the 3 reasons I got a surface instead of a new MacBook when my 2013 finally died. Regular USB was the 3rd (and least important)
Re:16-inch MacBook Pro by allover on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @02:49PM (#21528646)
There are the features a company "tries" to innovate on, vs those they consider uninteresting and just try to find a quality/cost balance.
Re:16-inch MacBook Pro by Aeolun on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @08:06PM (#21531724)
Maybe, but if I were designing this thing, both as an engineer or executive, it’d be a point of pride to me that the thing we advertise as the best laptop is actually the best laptop.

Especially if I know people are going to ask ‘wtf, why 720p’?