If you can use math to explain physics, physics to explain chemistry, chemistry to explain biology, biology to explain psychology, psychology to explain sociology, and sociology (plus history) to explain culture, then it would be fair to say you could use math to explain culture.

Of course, there's a lot of big gaps here, but the point is: trying to tie culture to biology is not without merit.

IMO, males and females both run on instinct through chaos crafted channels of superstition we call "culture". Like water running down a mountain in streams, it's not the channels which explain the waters movement downward (that's gravity), they just define the means through which it happens.

Implies that <people> have no agency and run on instinct: see psychology, marketing theory

Why not?

It's not just impractical; it's impossible to know enough of the variables to derive one from the other.

In practice "evolutionary" explanations are constantly used to make something intuitively plausible for which there is no evidence sound scientific and convincing.