Re:Google's harvest of medical data includes names and full ...
by mattkevan on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @05:41PM
(#21519020)
Also the Guardian isn’t owned by a Google competitor - it’s owned by the Scott Trust, an organisation set up specifically to maintain the paper’s editorial independence.
They have viewpoints which include a distrust of very powerful global corporations, and one you may or may not agree with - but it’s nowhere near ‘fake news’.
Re:Google's harvest of medical data includes names and full ...
by excalibur on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @02:31PM
(#21517260)
No, it really isn't. The Guardian article is factually reporting on what the "whistleblower" told them, both via the video and in a separate interview. They did not fabricate any details, or make any claims they knew to be false. They made a cursory attempt to present the other side of the story. Sensationalized, yes. Slanted, yes. But not fake.
There are obvious concerns around data security here, but the article is very heavily distorting facts to drive outrage.