Brokej window fallacy!

Without him there would be no WeWork but other less broken companies could have received the same capital, created jobs, etc

Good, then the money could have been put into something where it could be used to create something instead of just enriching some fraud. We don’t need more of these companies, we need good, solid companies that don’t screw people over to enrich some executives.

The same is true for Enron, Worldcom, Lehman Brothers, etc.

Creating a company and raising billions of dollars so you can defraud people is not about creating a company. It is about gaining money at others’ expense.

Do you understand now how your statement is not relevant?

> without him THERE WOULD BE NO COMPANY TO SUE

And with no company to sue, the plaintiff would have had their cash instead of worthless shares they were induced to purchased by a party with better information than she.