News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Curl to shell isn't so bad by kalefranz on Saturday November 09, 2019 @12:40PM (#21492869)
Conda has an .exe installer on Windows and a .pkg installer on macOS. Both signed by Anaconda, Inc. for the OS. There are RPM and deb bootstrap repos for Linux. Then there’s also the .sh shar file installer.
Re:Curl to shell isn't so bad by bonoboTP on Saturday November 09, 2019 @01:58PM (#21493484)
It would be nice to have something like a fusion of conda and apt to work right out of the box on distros like Ubuntu. Like an "apt install --user". I don't understand why we need root rights to install programs that will not need root rights to run anyway. Seems like a huge and obvious oversight to me. I guess it's not a big pain point because in most cases people use their own machines and have root access. Not always the case though in companies or university labs for example.
Re:Curl to shell isn't so bad by detuur on Saturday November 09, 2019 @09:51PM (#21496099)
I have been wondering this for ages. Just last week I had to manually set up KeePass, VSCode, IntelliJ, Guitar (git ui) by manually unpacking tarballs (luckily already built) into ~/bin. Guitar luckily had an AppImage which worked beautifully as a single executable.

For that reason alone I'm a huge fan of AppImage above snaps and flatpaks.