Laws hold the porn industry accountable for dangerous content

Re:Laws hold the porn industry accountable for dangerous con... by sytelus on Friday November 08, 2019 @03:56AM (#21480814)

TLDR;

1. They don't have to worry about latency due to review delays.

2. They can use vision based detection algos for classification which are much reliable than NLP based understanding.

3. They recruit users to do reviews for in-site benefits.

Unsaid but I suspect they also don't have to worry about user driven random virality for any content.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Laws hold the porn industry accountable for dangerous con... by noselasd on Friday November 08, 2019 @04:16AM (#21480883)

Surely there's a volume difference too ? I would expect images, videos etc. that people post to facebook outnumbers what people post to porn sites by many orders of magnitudes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Laws hold the porn industry accountable for dangerous con... by novok on Friday November 08, 2019 @05:43AM (#21481173)

There is also the issue where a lot of data posted on FB is meant to be semi-private, while content posted on these websites are meant to be public.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Laws hold the porn industry accountable for dangerous con... by gwd on Friday November 08, 2019 @03:59AM (#21480826)

> They recruit users to do reviews for in-site benefits.

I think this would be the best thing for a social media platform. Using a site requires using credits, and you can get credits one of three ways:

1. Paying a monthly fee

2. Performing maintenance activities like content reviews

3. Opting-in to advertising

[ Parent | on HN ]