News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AMD Q4:16-core Ryzen 9 3950X, Threadripper Up To 32-Core ... by andy_ppp on Thursday November 07, 2019 @10:34AM (#21474080)
Okay, fine. I will try for Elixir, Phoenix Live View and as little JS as possible and see how we go.
Re:AMD Q4:16-core Ryzen 9 3950X, Threadripper Up To 32-Core ... by FpUser on Thursday November 07, 2019 @11:29AM (#21474629)
I am not sure if Elixir is performance beast. But then again I do not know much about it other than it runs on VM.
Re:AMD Q4:16-core Ryzen 9 3950X, Threadripper Up To 32-Core ... by nobleach on Thursday November 07, 2019 @01:22PM (#21475777)
I wouldn't call Elixir/Phoenix a "top performer" in the league of Java/Vert.x or Rust/Actix (see TechEmpower benchmarks) but it does VERY well at chugging along and not falling to pieces. Its dev experience is really nice. Its missing type-safety, but, honestly, I quite enjoy messing with it.
Re:AMD Q4:16-core Ryzen 9 3950X, Threadripper Up To 32-Core ... by andy_ppp on Thursday November 07, 2019 @11:54AM (#21474871)
Everyone thinks Elixir is slow until they use it and then realise throughput is often more important than absolute performance.
Re:AMD Q4:16-core Ryzen 9 3950X, Threadripper Up To 32-Core ... by FpUser on Thursday November 07, 2019 @12:44PM (#21475347)
As I said I do not know much about Elixir so yo be the judge. I do however have doubts about throughput of well designed code running on VM being faster then that of native. My understanding is that on Erlang VM this throughput is achieved by using async and message passing patterns backed up by thread pools inside. All perfectly available for "low level" languages as well.
Re:AMD Q4:16-core Ryzen 9 3950X, Threadripper Up To 32-Core ... by andy_ppp on Friday November 08, 2019 @01:00AM (#21480265)
I understand, my preference is Elixir but while fast enough and scalable, it is a memory and cpu hog.