News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In the 17th Century, Leibniz Dreamed of a Machine That Co... by tudorw on Tuesday November 05, 2019 @04:42AM (#21450964)
Interesting, at what point do we let AI contribute new words to the lexicon, Shakespeare managed 15...
Re:In the 17th Century, Leibniz Dreamed of a Machine That Co... by pilsetnieks on Tuesday November 05, 2019 @04:59AM (#21451040)
I thought it was a misconception that Shakespeare added so much new words - him being a prolific and very popular writer, and with much of his corpus surviving to this day, his works get cited whenever there's a "first use" mentioned somewhere.

The fact that one of his plays is the oldest written source where a word was seen for the first time in written form doesn't mean that it wasn't in common use before that; indeed it could mean the opposite – because the spectators of his plays should be able to understand what the characters are speaking, not leave befuddled in need of translation.

Re:In the 17th Century, Leibniz Dreamed of a Machine That Co... by tudorw on Tuesday November 05, 2019 @10:30AM (#21453199)
Sure, it's contentious, what's not contentious is that our lexicon grows over time, how would an AI go about inventing a new word?
Re:In the 17th Century, Leibniz Dreamed of a Machine That Co... by ncmncm on Wednesday November 06, 2019 @12:14AM (#21459908)
The same ways we do: by scissors-and paste with parts of other words. Most if our English words are small alterations of proto-indo-european words.