News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Smartphone vs. the Camera Industry by CarVac on Friday November 01, 2019 @11:08PM (#21425641)
The A6600 sensor first appeared on the A6300, actually, not the A6000, so it's "only" three years old. That said, they've bumped into the upper limits of image quality; the newer 26MP sensor (which you'll find in the latest Fuji cameras) actually performs worse in low light than the preceding 24mp sensors.

>Imagine how many iPhones Apple would sell if the sensor were not much changed from the 6s and the camera software not changed at all.

Honestly, very little of the advances in cell phone cameras since the 6s have come from sensors; it's all computational. We're up against the brick wall that is photon noise.

Finally, the A6600 is very much not a flagship. The A9 II is the flagship, at three times the price ($4500).

Re:The Smartphone vs. the Camera Industry by asdfasgasdgasdg on Friday November 01, 2019 @11:15PM (#21425662)
And, despite the a6600 not being a flagship, if the light is anything less than perfect, it will take pictures that are plainly higher in quality than anything coming out of a phone.
Re:The Smartphone vs. the Camera Industry by kungito on Saturday November 02, 2019 @06:20AM (#21426851)
People keep forgetting about sensor sizes and pretend like their tiny smartphone flagship can compensate with some smart extrapolation and fake bokeh
Re:The Smartphone vs. the Camera Industry by flyinglizard on Saturday November 02, 2019 @09:47AM (#21427679)
Also, diffraction limits of smaller optics. All of that can be fixed to some extent computationally, but not in all situations (like moving subjects).