Re:U.S. opens a national security review of TikTok’s acquisi...
by morpheuskafka on Friday November 01, 2019 @01:29PM
(#21421444)
Shouldn't this issue be addressed by the free market rather than by the government getting involved? If there is evidence that the app censors content to serve CCP propaganda, then consumers can make the choice not to use it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. opens a national security review of TikTok’s acquisi...
by chillacy on Friday November 01, 2019 @09:33PM
(#21425312)
Markets work best when there is transparency: for instance adding MPG to car labels helps "the market" make good choices by informing customers at the point of sale. The law which dictates an MPG sticker is "the government getting involved".
Another example: trademarks allow superior brands to win over time. The enforcement of trademarks is "the government getting involved".
Re:U.S. opens a national security review of TikTok’s acquisi...
by ng12 on Friday November 01, 2019 @03:40PM
(#21422896)
The market is no longer free when China is involved. They'll gobble American market share (and use that market share to further their political goals) while completely blocking out American companies from the Chinese market.
Nobody would care if TikTok were Taiwanese or South Korean.
Re:U.S. opens a national security review of TikTok’s acquisi...
by crematoria on Friday November 01, 2019 @04:55PM
(#21423605)
The free market is usually predicated on rational actors. I don't think the target market of teenagers fits the bill, nor does any market, really, once propaganda enters the picture.