News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Buys Fitbit for $2.1B by onlyrealcuzzo on Friday November 01, 2019 @01:14PM (#21421248)
It's not a trade secret that we store data. I'm not giving away anything that isn't already public information. This is literally me giving a summary of our Terms of Use.

As far as I know, I'm allowed to say that: people I work with tend to be liberal. As far I know, I'm also allowed to say that: people I work with tend to view data as a liability not an asset. It's also public information that Google receives billions of requests per day. For me to extrapolate on that and say that even storing a single bit of data on those logs starts to add up and cost a lot of money isn't a trade secret either. It's common sense.

Re:Google Buys Fitbit for $2.1B by pbhjpbhj on Friday November 01, 2019 @01:39PM (#21421595)
Upthread you appeared to be making definite statements about exactly what information Google shares, you also mention working for the company which suggests you're speaking authoritatively and in a way that is endorsed by the company (and that's why external comms people don't like it).

A couple of actionable statements

- you don't store anything for more than 30 days (that doesn't mesh with analytics data which might be de-anonymisable IMO).

- you don't do any facial tracking. Which doesn't surprise me too much but I can imagine a future trial where a barrister is saying "your engineers claimed in public you didn't do this sort of tracking" and that providing extras jeopardy for damages.

It's not my area, however, I appreciate the openness. Thanks for sharing.