>"there is a bit about her contribution which is over inflated"

I guess your comment read as dismissive and disrespectful of the mathematician and the idea of equal opportunity on multiple levels.

And while I don't think it was a "great" article, I stand entirely behind my dismissal of your comment.

Explain why you're misquoting me. You even stop the quote mid clause. I can only construe this as a deliberate misrepresentation of what I said.

I disagreed with the article, which is quite clear in the literal words I wrote. You chose to attack me instead.