Re:Life expectancy for American men drops for a third year
by ackshually on Friday November 01, 2019 @09:58AM
(#21418832)
Very fair point, haven't thought about it that way. I wonder if any studies have been done on where the homeless in the liberal leaning cities actually originally come from.
As for the Dems in congress - You'd need the right kind of democrat also. I think Hillary clinton did a real number to that parties reputation during her time in power. The american democrats desperately need smart, ethical and above all honest new faces that will fight the rampant corruption in american politics.
Re:Life expectancy for American men drops for a third year
by zzyyzzxx on Friday November 01, 2019 @03:57PM
(#21423065)
In some cases, homeless people are given bus tickets to liberal cities by officials
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2017/dec/...
Re:Life expectancy for American men drops for a third year
by AlexTWithBeard on Friday November 01, 2019 @10:14AM
(#21419053)
People in the thread below were complaining about how toxic reddit is. Politics is ten times worse.
Why would a smart, ethical and honest person ever get within a gunshot of politics?
And should by any accident that happen, how such a person would survive?
Re:Life expectancy for American men drops for a third year
by TulliusCicero on Friday November 01, 2019 @02:29PM
(#21422207)
Don't think smart, ethical, and honest matters. Oh sure, those things are great and greatly preferable to the status quo. But the reason why other countries have good homeless policies and why we don't is not because they have unusually honest politicians, I don't think. They're just further left economically, and thus more supportive of the downtrodden.
This means there's a financial incentive for any given city to treat the homeless like shit. Classic free rider problem; why not let other cities deal with helping them?
If you look at the countries where they do a better job, what you largely see is not a handful of metros doing their part, while other cities and the national government completely shunt the responsibility. The whole country contributes, is at least sort of on the same page. At least, that's been my experience living in Germany and reading about other places.
So in my opinion, what we'd need to see is a federal mandate that doesn't let some cities mooch off of others' charity. But short of Bernie storming the white House and the Dems getting an overwhelming majority in both halves of Congress, it's hard to see that happening.
Anyway, I don't disagree that more liberal cities could do more, but at the same time I don't think the problem is solvable without national involvement.