News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’ by soperj on Thursday October 31, 2019 @12:39PM (#21410683)
I grew up in the same era, thinking the same thing. I'll have to go check that out.
Re:The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’ by jacobkg on Thursday October 31, 2019 @12:48PM (#21410799)
Even more surprising is to go back and read early Garfield.
Re:The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’ by RobertRoberts on Thursday October 31, 2019 @01:38PM (#21411473)
Maybe when a cartoon hits syndication that the quality dips?

I read somewhere that is when Bill Waters (of Calvin & Hobbs) quit creating, when syndication was his only viable option moving forward. (I think he was burning out)

I loved Garfield as a kid, but as an adult it was really dull. I tried to even enjoy the old stuff... But this makes Garfield awesome again: (you may need some Garfield experience before appreciating this)

https://garfieldminusgarfield.net/

Re:The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’ by DerekL on Thursday October 31, 2019 @04:44PM (#21413547)
Calvin and Hobbes was syndicated. What do you mean?
Re:The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’ by RobertRoberts on Thursday October 31, 2019 @10:29PM (#21415784)
Sorry if I wrote that vaguely, he did _not_ syndicate. He was burnt out and it was either close up shop or syndicate, he chose to close up shop.

I may be off on this a little, as I did a little reading to verify. Waterson was opposed to having other people write and draw the Calvin & Hobbs cartoon for him. He noted that so many other cartoons had done this and their quality had plumetted.

From memory (because it was written in his last book, and I can't find it online) he said that when he couldn't make a new cartoon every day and be happy with the quality, he would be done.

Edit: I may be conflating syndication with licensing.... :P

Re:The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’ by tempguy9999 on Thursday October 31, 2019 @02:24PM (#21411989)
I guess people just get tired of having to be machines of continual creation. It must be terribly wearing. I'm not surprised it becomes just crank-turning after a while.

Unrelated but I'd like to plug this which is brilliant, though it seems the author burned out a while ago. One of the best comics I've come across https://abstrusegoose.com/

Hit Random a few times and you'll start getting some good ones. He seems to be a high level physicist so there are some impenetrable bits of maths etc. which you can safely skip.

Re:The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’ by KineticLensman on Thursday October 31, 2019 @04:44PM (#21413538)
> I guess people just get tired of having to be machines of continual creation.

Gary Larson (Far Side) [0] is a great example of a great cartoonist who quit while he was ahead. I was both sad and appreciative when he stopped. Fawlty Towers [1] is an example of a series whose creators also intentionally stopped it before it jumped the shark.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Larson

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fawlty_Towers

Re:The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’ by lonelappde on Saturday November 02, 2019 @01:12AM (#21426003)
If you skip the abstruse stuff, it's just goose.
Re:The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’ by tempguy9999 on Saturday November 02, 2019 @08:02AM (#21427154)
I've no idea what you mean, but upvoted anyway for making me chuckle