News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pro (noun.), abbreviation of Professional: born 1798, die... by gambiting on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @11:28AM (#21388244)
So the question is.....why weren't those machines running at the higher frequency in the first place? Why would you only enable the turbo mode to play games but no to work in Excel?
Re:Pro (noun.), abbreviation of Professional: born 1798, die... by AdrianB1 on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @11:37AM (#21388359)
On AT computers you had to go to low frequency to play games built for XT's. For example M1 Abrams tank simulator was a slideshow on a XT at 4.77, slow but almost playable on 9.54, fine on a AT at 12 MHz and unplayable on a 386 at 40 MHz (it was like a movie played on 10x speed). On the 386 with turbo off (16 MHz) was playable.
Re:Pro (noun.), abbreviation of Professional: born 1798, die... by aequitas on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @11:36AM (#21388349)
It's actually the other way around. You'd have to disable the Turbo to play the games. Because they where synchronized to the slower cpu clock frequency. For your spreadsheets you would use Turbo. Marketingwise it mirght make more sense to have a button to make your computer faster instead of one that makes it slower.
Re:Pro (noun.), abbreviation of Professional: born 1798, die... by jessaustin on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @11:34AM (#21388312)
The games were unplayable at the higher frequency, presumably because they made some sort of assumption about the relation between clock speed and play speed. Typically the computer was on "turbo" all the time.
Re:Pro (noun.), abbreviation of Professional: born 1798, die... by nencrystation on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @11:35AM (#21388333)
The turbo button made the machine slower for compatibility with older programs, as described in the parent post.
Re:Pro (noun.), abbreviation of Professional: born 1798, die... by aphextim on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @11:34AM (#21388303)
Energy efficiency/consumption would be my first thought.