Re:Former FBI General Counsel Jim Baker Chooses Encryption o...
by mikece on Monday October 28, 2019 @10:09AM
(#21377135)
Not to mention that for counter-intelligence the clues aren't the contents of a message but who is contacting whom, when, how often, and from where, most all of which can be determined from network traffic monitoring even if the contents of the message can't be read. In fact, if someone who shouldn't be contacting someone in China/Middle East/etc is doing so using encrypted data, getting a search warrant should be easier. Requiring back-doors to encryption is just laziness on the part of Law Enforcement.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Former FBI General Counsel Jim Baker Chooses Encryption o...
by hackerrenews on Monday October 28, 2019 @11:37AM
(#21377895)
May I ask what’s your background in law enforcement or the intelligence community, or in counter-intelligence specifically?
Re:Former FBI General Counsel Jim Baker Chooses Encryption o...
by hackerrenews on Monday October 28, 2019 @04:32PM
(#21381330)
References to support the claims would also be helpful.
Sorry if that came across wrong. I may have misinterpreted the comment as being from the perspective of someone with work experience in these matters.