News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Panopticlick by zahma on Sunday October 27, 2019 @06:53PM (#21373000)
Re:Panopticlick by danShumway on Monday October 28, 2019 @10:22AM (#21377254)
If you're primarily worried about privacy, I recommend against spoofing your user agent unless you're only changing superficial details. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1404608

It's very hard to fake an OS or pretend to be a separate browser. If you're focusing on disinformation, you should probably be focusing on disinformation that's harder to detect.

Re:Panopticlick by OrgNet on Monday October 28, 2019 @09:31AM (#21376776)
the useragent is far from being the only metric used by panopticlick
Re:Panopticlick by zahma on Monday October 28, 2019 @10:20AM (#21377233)
I know that, but the UA does provide the highest number of bits of identifying information.
Re:Panopticlick by OrgNet on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @09:04PM (#21393700)
is that still true since operating systems and browsers automatically update themselves now?
Re:Panopticlick by zahma on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @07:31AM (#21396499)
Fair point, that probably lowers the odds of recognition a bit, but the UA stands out because of the multiple variables that it reports in one header. At least when I ran Panopticlick a few times with various configurations, that was always the factor which gave up the most bits of identifying info.