News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Economics Needs a Post-Crash Revolution by pas on Sunday October 27, 2019 @11:04AM (#21370150)
Cycles arise in any complex/dynamic system. It's natural. Managing it should be natural too. Applying dampening on the amplitudes would help. That's basically the mandate of central banks.

Growth is the consequence of population growth and technological progress and the process of specialization (comparative advantages). All three are in pretty much full force, so it's not just growth because greed.

(sorry for double posting :| )

Re:Economics Needs a Post-Crash Revolution by WalterBright on Sunday October 27, 2019 @05:23PM (#21372501)
The business cycle isn't really a cycle. It's a fractal, chaotic system.

A cycle is predictable, a chaotic system is not.

Re:Economics Needs a Post-Crash Revolution by pas on Monday October 28, 2019 @06:21PM (#21382363)
I purposefully haven't said periodicity or something else (maybe I should have added a bit more detail anyway.) The ebb and flow, the up and down the cycling is known, but when and its magnitude is not.

Sure it's chaotic and it probably has scale-free (self-similar or fractional-dimensional) properties at certain regimes, but on the large scale it's pretty well approximated by dynamic systems. (See the micro founded macro models used by central banks.)

Of course, we're getting better at modeling both micro and macro behavior of economies. (The caveat is that the economy also evolves so old models usually get less and less accurate, so job security for econometricians.)