Re:SoftBank’s WeWork Bailout Draws Investor Concern
by pcurve on Saturday October 26, 2019 @11:18AM
(#21364160)
I sometimes wonder how many new subscribers NYT and WSJ got from HN. There are quite a few posts linking to them. They're quite expensive for semi-casual readers unfortunately.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SoftBank’s WeWork Bailout Draws Investor Concern
by whyenot on Saturday October 26, 2019 @11:44AM
(#21364337)
A digital subscription to either of them is $1 a week. I think that's actually pretty reasonable.
Re:SoftBank’s WeWork Bailout Draws Investor Concern
by bogomipz on Saturday October 26, 2019 @12:00PM
(#21364428)
For WSJ $1 a week is only an introductory offer, good for only 2 months. Beyond that it's $19.50 a year.[1]
The $1 a week for nytimes is also a promotional rate. It's normally $3.75 a week.[2]
Re:SoftBank’s WeWork Bailout Draws Investor Concern
by k_sze on Saturday October 26, 2019 @12:37PM
(#21364659)
You mean $19.50 a month, not a year.
Re:SoftBank’s WeWork Bailout Draws Investor Concern
by bogomipz on Saturday October 26, 2019 @02:08PM
(#21365241)
Sorry yes, that's correct. Thanks.
Re:SoftBank’s WeWork Bailout Draws Investor Concern
by sgroppino on Saturday October 26, 2019 @11:25AM
(#21364204)
But how come they are usually upvoted so much to end up in the top 10?
Re:SoftBank’s WeWork Bailout Draws Investor Concern
by GauntletWizard on Saturday October 26, 2019 @11:39AM
(#21364296)
Becaues NYT and WSJ are the still the top names in news, and most people who want to be informed have some form of subscription to them.
Re:SoftBank’s WeWork Bailout Draws Investor Concern
by bpodgursky on Saturday October 26, 2019 @11:27AM
(#21364215)
Bluntly, because most HN users upvote and downvote based on title and personal agenda, and don't even try to read the article.
At best, they'll jump into the comments, leave a tangental opinion, and upvote and downvote accordingly.