News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Hitman hires hitman who hires hitman who hires hitman who hires hitman. Parent comment

Re:Hitman hires hitman who hires hitman who hires hitman who... by LegitShady on Saturday October 26, 2019 @10:34AM (#21363898)
Suggest some situations where hiring the hitman to kill a rival would be done with the correct intentions, then.

Because it sounds more like boilerplate you could use yourself to muddy things that aren't muddy.

It's ok to just say "killing your competition is bad". No moral ambiguity to it.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hitman hires hitman who hires hitman who hires hitman who... by ffsxcg on Saturday October 26, 2019 @11:24AM (#21364200)
I don’t have to. Thats the prosecution job, which, as you point out, is almost trivially easy.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hitman hires hitman who hires hitman who hires hitman who... by LegitShady on Sunday October 27, 2019 @05:15AM (#21368618)
no, no. you totally misunderstood. You're arguing we don't know the specific circumstance so we shouldn't make moral judgments. My reply was to ask you to suggest some situations where hiring a hitman to kill a business rival would be morally ambiguous.

That would be the job the of defense, not the job of the prosecution. They would be using your argument. Whats the morally ambiguous case here?

[ Parent | on HN ]