News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gmail marking email from me as spam by cnst on Friday October 25, 2019 @05:24PM (#21359380)
If this is the kind of technical advice you provide, which merely assumes that Google can do no wrong, and the user on the other end is incapable of pressing a button on a yet another website that checks email configuration, merely to confirm that the configuration of their mail server is not in any way incorrect, then it's not a surprise that you get downvoted into oblivion, according to your own statement earlier in this thread.
Re:Gmail marking email from me as spam by dang on Saturday October 26, 2019 @02:24AM (#21362064)
"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Gmail marking email from me as spam by mav3rick on Friday October 25, 2019 @08:23PM (#21360576)
I can't provide any technical advice unless the op shows their config. I am downvoted because this community is already biased thinking Google must be at fault and the configuration can't be wrong at all ?.
Re:Gmail marking email from me as spam by dang on Saturday October 26, 2019 @02:24AM (#21362065)
You were surely downvoted for posting unsubstantive and bilious comments, which don't belong here.

Please make your substantive points more thoughtfully.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Gmail marking email from me as spam by cnst on Friday October 25, 2019 @08:50PM (#21360750)
I would say the community is biased the other way around, where everyone always thinks that it's the little guy that has invalid configuration, instead of Google being at fault.

What sort of config do you require from the OP? Their domain name is public and uncensored right in the top of the post. Their configuration has been cross-checked by many people so far. A lot of folks claimed that it has issues (like a `?all` in SPF, or `p=none` in DMARC, or some other nonsense that any spammer would easily get right), but those issues have been rebuked as not being significant to the issue at stake, plus, there's absolutely no confirmation that fixing these "issues" would resolve the problem, either.