News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gitlab ‘rethinking’ third-party telemetry by hn_throwaway_99 on Thursday October 24, 2019 @06:20PM (#21349781)
Ouch, that whole thread under there is painfully oblivious:

> @cciresi if we follow Paul's guidance and just make this part of our terms and conditions, are we covered legally?

Earth to GitLab: You are not yet big enough to be at the "are we covered legally" stage. You are toast if that is your mindset.

Re:Gitlab ‘rethinking’ third-party telemetry by ryandrake on Thursday October 24, 2019 @06:54PM (#21350028)
When someone raises an ethical question and instead of addressing ethics, the company calls in the lawyers to address whether it's legal... your company is likely on the wrong track.
Re:Gitlab ‘rethinking’ third-party telemetry by elliekelly on Thursday October 24, 2019 @07:48PM (#21350344)
To be fair I’d say half the time I’m summoned into a discussion like that it’s because the person asking fully expects and wants me to say no to the proposal. Raising an issue with the plan of action set forth by someone more senior can be tricky to navigate politically.
Re:Gitlab ‘rethinking’ third-party telemetry by Aeolun on Thursday October 24, 2019 @08:27PM (#21350567)
On the other hand, if you need to find a hill to die on, this is probably a good one.
Re:Gitlab ‘rethinking’ third-party telemetry by rhizome on Thursday October 24, 2019 @07:50PM (#21350359)
AKA "well it's not illegal," a lousy lower-bound.