News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf... by xsmasher on Thursday October 24, 2019 @01:45PM (#21347154)
If someone breaks in and steals your storage, you are SOL.
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf... by madamelic on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:46PM (#21347850)
If a thief broke in and was smart enough to nab the security footage, pretty sure that person is too smart to be breaking into a place with cameras.
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf... by hnbroseph on Thursday October 24, 2019 @03:19PM (#21348216)
Or perhaps they are smart enough to break into such places :)
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf... by JohnFen on Thursday October 24, 2019 @04:15PM (#21348705)
Just spitballing here... if the only camera is the Ring, then bypassing it seems like it would be easy. You can blind the camera with a laser without being visible yourself, then approach it and tape over the camera, or just take a rock and knock the whole thing off the wall.
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf... by blotter_paper on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:06PM (#21347363)
1) Give the local computer a public key, and have all video get encrypted as it goes into storage.

2) Keep the associated private key protected to your preference of security and convenience.

3) Decrypt the videos when you want to view them (if you're comfortable storing the private key on your phone, the only difference to the end user should be lag -- unless they lose the private key).

Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf... by rescripting on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:19PM (#21347508)
How does encrypting your video help if the device that contains the video is stolen? The thief wont be able to view themselves committing the crime?
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf... by blotter_paper on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:30PM (#21347657)
Lulz, I took xsmasher to be worried about infosec in the case of a break-in -- I hadn't considered the issue of retaining the data until just now. Having it backup the encrypted video to cloud storage mitigates that worry while still keeping the info secure, though.
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf... by MisterTea on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:59PM (#21347987)
That's the fault of people who are completely brain dead and leave the DVR in plane sight. Hide the damn thing far from the monitor and run an hdmi/dvi extender.

That's what I did for a friend. We hid it in a kitchen cabinet behind canned items and ran a VGA cable to the living room TV on the other side of the kitchen wall. No one would know it was there.

Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf... by LinuxBender on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:22PM (#21347549)
rsync or lftp (sftp subsystem) to a chroot sftp server with encrypted partitions.

or 7-zip encrypt video chunks and upload using above method.

In both cases, you can control the server and the data. You can hand over data that is applicable to the period of time in question and you still have your local copy.

Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf... by ars on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:32PM (#21347693)
The time delay in your suggestion means you would miss the video that is most important if someone steals things.
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf... by LinuxBender on Thursday October 24, 2019 @03:23PM (#21348260)
You can use inotify to kick off rsync for each chunk. The delay would depend on video chunk size. Put the processing machine in a locked case that is anchored to the floor. You can probably get the last few minutes of them trying to jimmie the cabinet assuming they can even find it.