News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Messages via JSON by teko_ji on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @02:53PM (#21337638)
I think the author has made it as simple as possible for users and developers with basic skills.
Re:Messages via JSON by beefhash on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @02:55PM (#21337652)
While I agree with the notion of making things simple, security theater is worse than no security at all because it makes you feel safe when you may not be.
Re:Messages via JSON by teko_ji on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @02:59PM (#21337702)
Maybe so.)
Re:Messages via JSON by enedil on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:50PM (#21338195)
Quick and honest question: are you the author? You respond to lots of comments in the name of author, that's a rather surprising level of care about a niche piece of software.
Re:Messages via JSON by shujito on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @05:53PM (#21339439)
Is that a good or a bad thing to do?
Re:Messages via JSON by hk__2 on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @06:10PM (#21339591)
> Is that a good or a bad thing to do?

Posting comments in favor of a service without disclosing your’re its author is usually seen as a conflict of interest and, as such, a bad thing.

Re:Messages via JSON by Supermancho on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:30AM (#21342179)
> Posting comments in favor of a service without disclosing your’re its author is usually seen as a conflict of interest

Not sure why, since it isn't in any practical or philosophical sense.

I judge the merits of a post by the content. I don't know if you're Celebrity X or Author of Y and I don't care much. Yes it would be useful to reference other statements, but that's something you often sacrifice in an open (even moderated) online forum. It's a strength of the platform as well.