News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We Need to Dream Bigger Than Bike Lanes by cyborgx7 on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @09:18AM (#21334304)
This is a silly thing to jump towards in the discussion, since it's not like we are anywhere close to the situation in which we have next to no private transport. In fact, we are almost at the other extreme.

But if I was to indulge you, I would say that public transport doesn't mean rails. In the case of buses it also uses roads. And of course, if we were to abolish all motorized private person transport (again, no where even close to that) of course there would need to be a system to allow for the transport of items that are too big to be transported by individuals in public transport. I assumed that goes without saying.

Re:We Need to Dream Bigger Than Bike Lanes by bluGill on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @09:58AM (#21334674)
I didn't jump there. The parent statement is "More public transport and less cars is always an improvement" jumped there.
Re:We Need to Dream Bigger Than Bike Lanes by cyborgx7 on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @01:34PM (#21336885)
Pretty sure that was you.
Re:We Need to Dream Bigger Than Bike Lanes by CDSlice on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @02:21PM (#21337322)
> I disagree. There is no need for a "balancing act" between cars and public transport. More public transport and less cars is always an improvement.

Sound familiar?

Re:We Need to Dream Bigger Than Bike Lanes by cyborgx7 on Thursday October 24, 2019 @06:52AM (#21343307)
I'm not denying that this was a quote from me. I'm denying that this is what brought it into this weird theoretical extreme area.

You also haven't responded to my response yet. You just ignored it and are trying to derail the discussion with a meta argument. Unless you are going to address the actual content of the arguments, I'm done with this conversation.