Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by hanklazard on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @09:04AM
(#21334181)
Narduar is my favorite example of a master interviewer. Watch him leave Pharrell speechless multiple times (starting around the 5:15 mark is a good example). This guy does his homework better than anyone.
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by throw0101a on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @12:39PM
(#21336346)
My go-to examples of people going from skeptical to "WTF?" are Waka Flocka Flame:
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMyvB2wAXYI
And A$AP Rocky
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8IYpVF_S5M
He also seems to be able to 'find' people just before they really make it big/mainstream, like Kendrick Lamer, Billie Eilish, and Tyler the Creator. I heard about them from Narduar before anywhere else.
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by hanklazard on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @01:16PM
(#21336712)
Will check him out, thanks for the tip!
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by arielserafini on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @10:39AM
(#21335056)
His researching skills are indeed impressive, but I feel like he's a bit "loud" in his personality/character and that can take some attention away from the interviewee.
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by hanklazard on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @11:44AM
(#21335788)
I'd say he's just eccentric, and takes a bit of getting used to in terms of style. also, IIRC, this interview got him some REALLY big ones (including Jay-Z, I think) because Pharrell told everyone he knew to that they had to talk with Nardwuar.
At the very least in terms of doing proper research on a subject, I think there's no one better.
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by skyyler on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @11:23AM
(#21335556)
In his interviews he really doesn't draw attention away from the interviewee. You're right about him having a strong personality but it's obvious to me that he tries very hard to never outshine the person he's interviewing.
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by throw0101a on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @12:40PM
(#21336364)
If you're not used to him, and are coming in 'cold' to watch one of his interviews, then it can be a bit distracting. After a few I think it goes into the background more.
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by personlurking on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @08:42AM
(#21333965)
Peter Robinson (of the Hoover Institution) is a good example of a master interviewer, with his Uncommon Knowledge series. Here's one of the last ones I saw:
Peter Thiel on “The Straussian Moment” (Sept 2019)
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by waffle_ss on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @09:21AM
(#21334329)
Definitely; he actually came to my mind but I didn't want to ruffle ideological feathers due to his neoliberal ties. Not that he should be pigeonholed as such - an excellent interview about Leon Trotsky he did with Christopher Hitchens and a Trotsky biographer comes to mind.
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by slededit on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @02:18PM
(#21337298)
He is in the style of Larry King, who famously doesn't do research so he can put himself in the shoes of the audience and ask questions that would be on their mind. It's a valid technique and works well with a laymen audience. What you are describing is a totally different type of show that goes more in depth on fewer subjects.
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by ghostpepper on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @09:52AM
(#21334622)
Since others are posting examples of who they consider master interviewers, I need to include Sean Evans from the spicy-chicken-wing-gauntlet interview show Hot Ones.
His guests routinely compliment him on his prep and the questions he ask. The show would be just as good without the hot sauce gimmick.
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by waffle_ss on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @11:48AM
(#21335832)
It's been quite a long time since I watched a Hot Ones but my impression was Sean Evans does great research with excellent questions, but he's often pretty stiff when he has to steer the conversation - it's like he has a clipboard with questions that he is focused on getting through. He is pretty quick and capable of riffing off guests' comments, but - perhaps due to time constraints - he jumps right back to his list of questions.
The Hot Ones episodes I found the most entertaining were the ones where the guest was the dominant one, steering the conversation, and the questions were incidental / not necessary.
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by Spellman on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:45PM
(#21338152)
I kinda agree.
He honestly doesn't add that much by being in the room vs if someone else had the same questionnaire sheet. And in some ways his wooden demeanor can even be detracting instead of some of the best interviewers who can melt away and give the interviewee the space and direction to shine.
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by xeromal on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @12:56PM
(#21336531)
Perhaps him acting as uninformed and a layman helps bridge the gap between an average joe and someone who is very informed. Sometimes acting stupid or being stupid is a great way to help smart people explain their points.
Re:Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]
by arielserafini on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @10:27AM
(#21334944)
Terry Gross is a (the?) master interviewer.
Joe does little research on most guests (mostly due to the sheer volume of guests I'm sure), which could be a more stylistic choice if he were a deft interviewer who could think on his feet and dig deep anyway, but he's not. He's an everyman and asks very surface-level questions. As you say guests are (usually) given wide latitude to own the mic, which works great when it's a guest with a compelling narrative. It works terribly when the guest is very ideological or has some sort of agenda they are adept at selling.
The times he does challenge a guest (sometimes way too aggressively as others in the thread have shown), oftentimes he has missed the point entirely, and the guest has to back up and try to patch the conversation. Once that happens a couple times the flow of the interview is really disturbed and it takes a long time to recover.
I like Joe as a person, and admire his discipline, but to call him a master interviewer would be as accurate as calling him a master comedian because he has been grinding so long.