News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Firefox 70 by GhettoMaestro on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @10:35AM (#21324042)
The performance is what has kept me on Chrome on Mac. Going to re-install FF now and give it a whirl. Thanks for this info!
Re:Firefox 70 by lordnacho on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @10:56AM (#21324301)
I just tried this. Interestingly I'd left it on v68 and it cooked my MBP, fans all on max immediately. When I updated to 70 it seems to work perfectly. CPU temp in the 40s. Gonna leave it on in the background and see if it suddenly spikes.
Re:Firefox 70 by chenster on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @11:30AM (#21324769)
The same here. Have you tried with FF add-ons that normally are the culprit for CPU hogging?
Re:Firefox 70 by lordnacho on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @12:17PM (#21325428)
Yeah, they're all on. Seems to be fine thus far, and there's an article about what they actually did to fix it, so I'm ready to say it's fixed.

Only minor gripe is userChrome.css seems to not be used now.

Re:Firefox 70 by sharps1 on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @12:35PM (#21325652)
You need to enable it in about:config

Set this option to true: toolkit.legacyUserProfileCustomizations.stylesheets

Re:Firefox 70 by Karunamon on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @12:59PM (#21325976)
That's a slightly worrying precedent, they're calling the way to diaable certain bits of obnoxiousness (the header bar in Tree Style Tabs comes to mind) "legacy", which is usually a precursor to removal.

Is there a new method available/forthcoming, or is this more control planned to be wrenched out of user's hands?

Re:Firefox 70 by lordnacho on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @12:54PM (#21325897)
Was set to true already.
Re:Firefox 70 by carey on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:12AM (#21331957)
Was it referring to browser.xul? There’s no XUL left, so you might need to change that to browser.xhtml.
Re:Firefox 70 by chenster on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @11:35AM (#21324844)
You can also use Brave browser, it's basically Chrome with the ad tracking removed. With that, almost no reason to switch to another browser.
Re:Firefox 70 by needle0 on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @10:55PM (#21330636)
You’re still contributing to the Chromium engine monoculture, though.
Re:Firefox 70 by chenster on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @12:48AM (#21331140)
Guess we are dealing with purists here. Mind you that Chromium is free and open-source just like MySQL. A strategical move by the community to fork MySQL to MariaDB to ensure it remained free and open from the tech giant after it was acquired by Oracle. How Brave is any different? It made a similar move. Some people hate crypto. Fine. Personally I've never used the Brave crypto. Perhaps FF 70 has completely fixed its performance problem, sure, happy to switch. But before that really happens Brave is still a viable interim solution.
Re:Firefox 70 by rovr138 on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:44AM (#21332557)
The issue is the engine. There are few big engines out there and chromium is taking a lot of the market.

The issue with this is that they could start controlling the standards and everyone would have to follow behind instead of everyone working and doing what’s best for consumers.

While chromium is open source, that doesn’t mean they have to accept merges from the community. It only means that they have to provide the source code. Yes it can be forked, but now you have to maintain or develop your engine. If they’re the dominant ones and are setting standards, that won’t help much.

By using another one you are helping keep a neutral ground.

The difference between MySQL and MariaDB is that you have PostgreSQL, Oracle, SQLite, MSSQL among a bunch of others, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_relational_datab...

So the issue isn’t forking or not, but the fact that it’s still close enough that gives chromium the competitive edge and could kill the market.

Re:Firefox 70 by devy on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @11:48AM (#21325041)
Brave looks amazing, the question I have is, just like how Google Chrome, can they be trusted as a private entity?
Re:Firefox 70 by TylerE on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @11:59AM (#21325200)
Well, they're shilling their own worthless cryptocurrency, so it is obvious to me that they cannot be.
Re:Firefox 70 by FillardMillmore on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @12:08PM (#21325318)
It is an opt-in system. They're not making you use it and you don't lose anything by choosing not to opt-in. What exactly are they doing that you would consider "shilling"?

https://brave.com/brave-rewards/

Re:Firefox 70 by TylerE on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @12:26PM (#21325557)
What would you call creating a new alt-coin and implying it will some day have value?

That entire industry is a dumpster fire of greed, fraud, and misrepresentation.

Re:Firefox 70 by eitland on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @12:59PM (#21325970)
A good chunk of HN is really fed up with cryptocurrencies.

Whoever are pushing them - including Telegram that I otherwise like - are damaging their reputation in my eyes.

Re:Firefox 70 by Angeo34 on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @10:33PM (#21330530)
>injects own custom http headers so advertisers can uniquely identify you even easier

>takes crypto donation hostage and opens funds in other people's names (i.e. scams crypto to artificially create demand for that BAT)

If you use Brave you literally are part of the problem.

Re:Firefox 70 by GhettoMaestro on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @03:17PM (#21327501)
Interesting. Any downside of Brave? Small userbase, etc ?
Re:Firefox 70 by xtracto on Thursday October 24, 2019 @05:03PM (#21349141)
I use it in my Android, because it allows me to have an ad blocking browser without rooting and without installing any additional software.

My gripe there is that it started showing push notifications of ads!!! Once I blocked all its notifications everything went to normality.

Re:Firefox 70 by moystard on Saturday October 26, 2019 @01:59PM (#21365174)
This would be a showstopper for me. Turning off the notifications addresses only part of the issue, I would never trust them again.

Why not use Firefox?