News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:London Ultra Low Emission Zone cuts toxic air pollution b... by cjrp on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @08:51AM (#21323009)
Does that justify using bus lanes though? Are they providing enough of a benefit to everyone, like a bus does?
Re:London Ultra Low Emission Zone cuts toxic air pollution b... by isostatic on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @08:59AM (#21323086)
They are typically moving between 0 and 1 passenger around -- worse than cars.
Re:London Ultra Low Emission Zone cuts toxic air pollution b... by C1sc0cat on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @10:19AM (#21323838)
Multi occupancy - its actually more cost effective for a group of 4 or 5 to jump in a Cab for a short trip than to use the underground.
Re:London Ultra Low Emission Zone cuts toxic air pollution b... by isostatic on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @12:53PM (#21325883)
So you would argue that bus lanes should be HOV lanes - if you have at least 3 people in your car you can use it (although if it's a taxi, minimum would be 4 people)
Re:London Ultra Low Emission Zone cuts toxic air pollution b... by vkou on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @11:03AM (#21324410)
I can't speak for London, but in my experience, cabs are more likely to have a single passenger, than cars are to have a single driver.
Re:London Ultra Low Emission Zone cuts toxic air pollution b... by C1sc0cat on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @12:29PM (#21325580)
And your point is exactly what
Re:London Ultra Low Emission Zone cuts toxic air pollution b... by isostatic on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @01:06PM (#21326057)
Given that cabs typically have 1 passenger in, why should they be allowed in bus lanes?
Re:London Ultra Low Emission Zone cuts toxic air pollution b... by C1sc0cat on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:15AM (#21332375)
I was making the point that the responder had no experience of London cabs.

And its common for groups to use cabs in London and also for those with heavy luggage or who are disabled Black cabs a re a godsend in London