Re:SoftBank to take control of WeWork: Sources
by jessaustin on Monday October 21, 2019 @07:57PM
(#21318926)
I have no particular love for any of the big-name "prestigious" VCs, but ISTM they haven't had much influence at WeWork so far. Instead SoftBank just handed the keys to a crazy dude, with the thought that he would make it rain. Maybe it didn't rain hard enough, but the firm is still in business and now they've gotten rid of the crazy dude. Maybe SoftBank just sees this as a slightly more intense version of the traditional transition from founders to "professional" management? It seems likely to feature a great deal of the equity dilution that founders traditionally suffer...
Re:SoftBank to take control of WeWork: Sources
by flukus on Monday October 21, 2019 @08:31PM
(#21319148)
Considering their current vetting is quite lacking, shouldn't they be looking to hire someone experienced? You don't hire a junior engineer to build you're new enterprise system.
Re:SoftBank to take control of WeWork: Sources
by ms4720 on Monday October 21, 2019 @11:39PM
(#21320192)
Perhaps shouldn't would be more accurate
Re:SoftBank to take control of WeWork: Sources
by duxup on Monday October 21, 2019 @08:19PM
(#21319061)
I don't see why someone with that history would necessarily do a poor job.
Re:SoftBank to take control of WeWork: Sources
by OnlineGladiator on Monday October 21, 2019 @08:29PM
(#21319133)
I think his point is an insider can't see the forest through the trees, and you need a fresh perspective to understand what's really happening. Basically that hiring an insider just perpetuates the echo chamber.
Re:SoftBank to take control of WeWork: Sources
by duxup on Monday October 21, 2019 @08:58PM
(#21319307)
What makes that resume necessarily an insider?
Re:SoftBank to take control of WeWork: Sources
by OnlineGladiator on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @12:11AM
(#21320315)
He means the entire VC industry is an echo chamber.
They had one open position. It required all applications to have an extensive history at a prestigous VC firm, i.e. they are looking for people from the in-group.
I think a less-incestuous vetting strategy would give more honest results. Too bad, I think there's a lot of people on HN who would excel at this position despite not having worked at a big VC.