AWS Customers Rack Up Hefty Bills for Moving Data

Re:AWS Customers Rack Up Hefty Bills for Moving Data by codexon on Monday October 21, 2019 @05:45PM (#21317805)

Cold potato is not necessarily better, actually its often times worse than hot potato and usually used to lower costs so you don't have to pay other people for transit.

For example, a cold potato network may have a link from Dallas to Chicago to New York, while a hot potato network could have a direct link from Dallas to New York.

Cogent uses cold potato and is frequently worse than other transit providers.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AWS Customers Rack Up Hefty Bills for Moving Data by gcommer on Monday October 21, 2019 @06:02PM (#21317958)

Google's cold potato is very good though.

(Also, they offer the option to use hot potato and pay them less: https://cloud.google.com/network-tiers/docs/overview )

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AWS Customers Rack Up Hefty Bills for Moving Data by achiang on Monday October 21, 2019 @11:09PM (#21320039)

Thanks, you made my day.

I'm a Google network SRE, but perhaps I'll get new business cards saying "cold potato engineer".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AWS Customers Rack Up Hefty Bills for Moving Data by Dylan16807 on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @01:29AM (#21331379)

So it's hard to value the premium for google cold potato specifically, if it outclasses everything else.

But their hot potato still costs $65+ per TB at medium volumes and $45+ per TB at high volumes. That is still extremely high compared to normal peering costs.

[ Parent | on HN ]