Re:“We have no reason to believe 5G is safe”
by swader999 on Monday October 21, 2019 @10:38AM
(#21312748)
It is impossible to find a control group that hasn't been previously exposed to some form of 2/3/4g radiation
.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“We have no reason to believe 5G is safe”
by pstch on Monday October 21, 2019 @12:16PM
(#21314014)
This is often repeated, but I wonder if it's completely true. I'd completely understand if it was harder, and more expensive, to find such a control group, but it surprises me that it would be "impossible".
I can think of a few people I know that are much less exposed to 2/3/4g radiation, by living in the forest and not having a phone on them all the time. Isn't a control group that has been exposed to significantly less radiation still useful ?
Re:“We have no reason to believe 5G is safe”
by carapace on Monday October 21, 2019 @12:30PM
(#21314194)
The Sentinelese, but they shoot visitors.