“We have no reason to believe 5G is safe”

Re:“We have no reason to believe 5G is safe” by BurnGpuBurn on Monday October 21, 2019 @08:49AM (#21311646)

> "Here's a large number of studies saying X" is meaningless in a topic where a very large number of studies have been done. What you need is systematic reviews of the literature that not only count studies, but evaluate their quality and combine their results.

The sixth link in the article will get you what you want: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138357421...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“We have no reason to believe 5G is safe” by 99052882514569 on Monday October 21, 2019 @08:56AM (#21311712)

"The present review - of results published by my group from 2006 until 2016"

Self-evaluation of quality is not quite a systemic review of literature. Neither is research on drosophila melanogaster quite in the same ballpark as research on homo sapiens.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“We have no reason to believe 5G is safe” by tboyd47 on Monday October 21, 2019 @01:52PM (#21315173)

Thank you. The sheer volume of blatantly false comments on this thread is astounding to me.

[ Parent | on HN ]