News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:To hire neurodiverse workers, one firm got rid of job int... by x220 on Monday October 21, 2019 @04:42AM (#21310308)
What if instead of discriminating by race, you don't hire people who live in mostly-black neighborhoods?
Re:To hire neurodiverse workers, one firm got rid of job int... by imtringued on Monday October 21, 2019 @10:22AM (#21312559)
You hire based on university "prestige" instead.
Re:To hire neurodiverse workers, one firm got rid of job int... by pluma on Monday October 21, 2019 @08:07AM (#21311265)
Codes of law aren't software. It's not a loophole, it's just an overly naive interpretation of what the law says based on your layperson understanding and applying programmer logic to non-software.

If you explicitly don't accept applicants only from select neightborhoods that all just "happen to" be almost all-black, you're still discriminating by race and it's still obvious and obviously illegal. You'll just waste more of everyone's time in court.

Just look at sovereign citizens and their inane shenanigans like "I'm not driving, I'm traveling by car and therefore don't need a driver's license and can ignore speed limits".

Re:To hire neurodiverse workers, one firm got rid of job int... by romwell on Monday October 21, 2019 @10:57AM (#21312982)
The comment you are responding to is highlighting the ridiculousness of the comment above it.

However, everything you wrote does apply to the level-up comment.